Articles

Javier Milei Defeats Sergio Massa to Win Argentina’s Presidential Election

Nov 20, 2023

With five sovereign defaults over the past 50 years, inflation currently rising above 140%, and the economy in recession, Argentina was due for a political shift.1 Argentines voted decisively for change, with Javier Milei defeating current Finance Minister Segio Massa in the runoff Presidential election by a wide ~12% margin, gaining nearly 56% of the vote. Milei will take office on December 10th, with his La Libertad Avanza party having little power in the Lower House and Senate. Sergio Massa conceded the result on the night of the election, paving the way for a smooth transition of power.

Key Takeaways

  • Javier Milei defeated Sergio Massa in Argentina’s runoff Presidential election, receiving 56% of the votes.
  • Gridlock and aligned economic policies will likely pave the way for continued moderation from Milei.
  • Milei’s Presidency represents a pivotal political shift for the country, which could help unlock Argentina’s true economic potential.

We see the Milei victory as the clear positive outcome for markets, with his Administration likely having to moderate in order to govern effectively. We have been impressed with Milei’s actions on this front since the first round of voting. His negotiations with the Juntos coalition showed flexibility within his ideological framework, easing fears that he would not moderate. Milei’s victory also proves that he can maintain support from his core voters while coming to the middle. As a result, we see declining execution risks surrounding his ability to successfully implement orthodox fiscal and economic policies while maintaining public support.

Fears around his more radical proposals, such as dollarization and the elimination of the Central Bank, are likely to remain in focus. But in the short term, gridlock in congress should greatly reduce his ability to implement these changes. Furthermore, on the topic of dollarization, the first steps required align well with the orthodox fiscal and economic plans put forth by the Juntos coalition. We do, however, see these fears potentially weighing on investor appetite in the short term until Milei gains some sort of track record and while we await important cabinet appointment announcements. Overall, the Milei Presidency represents a major shift for the country’s economic outlook, which should drive foreign investment into the country and unlock Argentina’s true economic potential.

Category: Articles

Topics: Emerging Markets

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Diversification does not ensure a profit nor guarantee against a loss.

This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information is not intended to be individual or personalized investment or tax advice and should not be used for trading purposes. Please consult a financial advisor or tax professional for more information regarding your investment and/or tax situation.

The risks of foreign investments are typically greater in less developed countries, which are sometimes referred to as emerging markets. For example, legal, political and economic structures in these countries may be changing rapidly, which can cause instability and greater risk of loss. These countries are also more likely to experience higher levels of inflation, deflation or currency devaluation, which could hurt their economies and securities markets. For these and other reasons, investments in emerging markets are often considered speculative. Similarly, investors are also subject to foreign securities risks including, but not limited to, the fact that foreign investments may be subject to different and in some circumstances less stringent regulatory and disclosure standards than US investments. Geopolitical and other events, including war, terrorism, economic uncertainty, trade disputes, natural and environmental disasters, systemic market dislocations, public health crises and related geopolitical events have led, and in the future may lead, to increased market volatility, which may disrupt U.S. and world economies and markets and may have significant adverse direct or indirect effects on the value of a Fund and its investments.